The Darfur Consortium

. . .

Darfur in the News

U.S. and European media

October 9, 2023

Christian Science Monitor: Sudan makes case abroad while still bombing Darfur. During the US vice presidential debate last week, Sen. Joe Biden (D) and Gov. Sarah Palin (R) found common ground on at least one topic: Both support imposing a no-fly zone in Sudan's troubled Darfur region. Some 6,000 miles away, Darfuris fleeing their homes welcome such talk, especially after a recent spate of indiscriminate government bombings. "The government said it was only looking for rebels. It said it didn't want to harm the people," says villager Abdullah Isshac, who spent one week hiding in the countryside after a government attack on the village of Khazan Tungur. "But the rebels are out in the mountains, not in the village."

The following op-ed by Jonathan Fanton appeared in today's Chicago Tribune. 

The UN Security Council and Omar al-Bashir

Three years ago I was in Abuja, Nigeria, at a lecture given by Justice Richard Goldstone, the first chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia He talked about preventing and prosecuting crimes against humanity.

During the question period, a member of the audience stood up. His arms had been amputated. His voice trembled with anger as he asked a piercing question: "How can the Nigerian government protect Charles Taylor from justice?"

Taylor, the disgraced former president of Liberia, had been responsible for a campaign of mutilation, rape and mass killing in Sierra Leone. Indicted for war crimes by the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Taylor fled to Nigeria in 2003, where he was granted asylum and lived in considerable comfort.

The incident moved me deeply and convinced me of a principle: The voice of victims seeking justice must be heard above the negotiations of politicians and diplomats. Peace without justice is no peace at all.

This principle is once more being tested as the UN Security Council considers whether to suspend proceedings against the president of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, by the International Criminal Court.

The mass atrocities in Darfur shocked the conscience of the world. On March 31, 2005, the Security Council responded, referring the situation to the ICC--a move that gave hope that the perpetrators would be held to account.

After careful investigation, the prosecutor of the ICC announced this year that he would seek an arrest warrant for Bashir. The allegations included war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. At once, the government of Sudan launched a diplomatic campaign to end the legal process.

According to the court, the council has the right to suspend any ICC proceedings for up to 12 months, renewable. The court assumes that any such action would be to promote peace.

Sudan has apparently persuaded almost half of the council to support suspension. In July, Libya and South Africa amended a resolution renewing the UN-African Union peacekeeping force in Darfur to express concern about the actions of the prosecutor. They were supported by China, though--to its credit--not by the U.S.

Objections to action against Bashir are not limited to the Security Council. Both the African Union and the Organization of the Islamic Conference have demanded a suspension; it is feared that some of their members may even withdraw from the ICC.

Opponents contend that proceeding against Bashir would interfere with the peace process in Darfur--the same claim used against the indictment of Charles Taylor.

That argument does not convince. Taylor's indictment was unsealed by the Special Court for Sierra Leone at a sensitive moment--just as he was arriving for peace talks in Ghana. Many diplomats greeted the news of the indictment with frustration and anger, convinced that it would spark attacks in Liberia and thwart the peace process. The feared retaliatory violence never materialized. No matter how they felt at the time, those who took part in the negotiations now agree that, because Taylor was removed from the peace talks, the indictment contributed to their success.

Peace talks in Sudan are stalled while Bashir plays for time. Allowing the legal process against him to move forward is unlikely to make the unpromising diplomatic situation worse, and could provide leverage to speed a resolution.

Three million people in Darfur have been forced from their homes, perhaps 400,000 killed. If there is to be peace, there must be justice for the victims as well as a diplomatic resolution to the conflict.

The Security Council should not stand in the way of the ICC. To do so would undermine the fledgling system of international justice, may not advance peace in Darfur and would betray those who have suffered terrible crimes.

The victims of Darfur deserve to be heard as they ask: "How can the Security Council protect Omar al-Bashir from justice?"

Jonathan Fanton is president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

The Darfur Daily News is a service of the Save Darfur Coalition. To subscribe to the Daily News, please email [email protected]. For media inquiries, please contact Ashley Roberts at (202) 478-6181, or [email protected].


African Voices
Join the Darfur Consortium


Action Professionals Association for the People

Aegis Trust Rwanda

African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies

African Center for Development

African Center for Justice and Peace Studies

Africa Internally Displaced Persons Voice (Africa IDP Voice)

African Security Dialogue and Research (ASDR)

African Women's Development and Communications Network (FEMNET)

The Ahueni Foundation

Alliances for Africa

Amman Centre for Human Rights Studies

Andalus Institute for Tolerance

Anti-Slavery International

Arab Coalition for Darfur

Arab Program for Human Rights Activists

Association Africaine de Defense des Droits de l'Homme (ASADHO)

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies

Centre for Minority Rights Development (CEMIRIDE)

Centre for Research Education and Development of Freedom of Expression and Associated Rights (CREDO)

Citizens for Global Solutions

Conscience International

Conseil National Pour les Libertés en Tunisie

Darfur Alert Coalition (DAC)

Darfur Centre for Human Rights and Development

Darfur Leaders Network (DLN)

Darfur Reconciliation and Development Organization (DRDO)

Darfur Relief and Documentation Centre

East Africa Law Society

Egyptian Organization for Human Rights

Femmes Africa Solidarité

La Fédération Internationale des Droits de l'Homme (FIDH)

Forum of African Affairs (FOAA)

Human Rights First

Human Rights Institute of South Africa (HURISA)

Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa

Institute for Security Studies

Inter-African Union for Human Rights (UIDH)


International Commission of Jurists (ICJ Kenya)

International Refugee Rights Initiative

Justice Africa

Justice and Peace Commission

Lawyers for Human Rights

Lebanese Association for Democratic Elections

Legal Resources Consortium-Nigeria

Ligue Tunisienne des Droits de l'Homme

Makumira University College, Tumaini University

Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA)

Minority Rights Group

National Association of Seadogs

Never Again International

Open Society Justice Initiative

Pan-African Movement

Rencontre Africaine Pour la Defense des Droits de l'Homme (RADDHO)

Sierra Leone STAND Chapter

Sisters' Arabic Forum for Human Rights (SAF)

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP)

Sudan Organization Against Torture (SOAT)

Syrian Organization for Human Rights

Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)

Universal Human Rights Network


Women Initiative Nigeria (WIN)

©2007 Darfur Consortium. Design by Deirdre Reznik